🔗 Share this article

During last year's race for the White House, the former president courted the electorate with pledges to reduce costs immediately upon taking office. However, once he assumed office, there was precious little attention to affordability issues. All that changed following price-fatigued voters delivered a rebuke at the polls. Within days, his team launched a slapdash campaign to tackle affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, inconsistencies, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Supermarket Reality

Just two days after the election, the president began his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

His assertion that everything was “way down” was highly misleading and inaccurate. In what way could all costs be decreasing when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data show banana prices rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up 14.7%, and the cost of coffee jumped 18.9%—in part because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in five of the six food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

Despite these numbers, the president continues to push his misleading narrative about lower costs. After the vote, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the fact that general costs have clearly increased after the previous administration. Currently, inflation is running at a 3% annual rate, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, despite government figures show they average $3.19.

Confronted by actual conditions and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “prices are down” message made him sound dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. Many voters are angry about prices continuing to climb after assurances of reductions. As a result, aides proposed one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With certain taxes reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will probably claim that he has cut prices once these products begin to fall in price. This would be similar to a firestarter taking credit for extinguishing a fire that he had started. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, he declared that “this is the peak period of America” and assured listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to countless households facing hardships—particularly when millions risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey conducted last fall, 74% of Americans believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. Another poll found that a majority of citizens say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Truth and Proposed Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, lately disputed claims of a golden age. He stated that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about affordability, the president proposed a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about huge budget deficits—will approve the proposal. The scheme could increase federal spending, push up interest rates, and potentially drive prices higher by putting more money into the economy.

A further proposed solution for cost issues centered on creating half-century home loans, based on the idea that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, the truth is that such lengthy loans would do little to reduce installments—frequently reducing them by a small amount per month. The downside is that these mortgages could more than double the total interest homeowners pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Economic Outlook

As part of their affordability campaign, the administration have once more blamed Biden for financial challenges, such as rising prices. Officials stated they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. Actually, Biden left a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. But, Trump’s policies—especially his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

According to an economist, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He fears that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Sadly, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.