As a Committed Capitalist, But Medicare for All Is the Best Solution for American Healthcare

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name multiple businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.

Amy Adams
Amy Adams

A seasoned sports analyst and betting expert with over a decade of experience in the gambling industry, specializing in football and tennis markets.